Back to Workfare law “incompatible” with European Convention of Human Rights

BBC report: Legislation introduced after appeal ruled back-to-work scheme legally flawed ruled “incompatible” with European Convention of Human Rights

Full ruling: Reilly (No. 2) & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWHC 2182 (Admin) (04 July 2014)  http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2014/2182.html

PIL: High Court grants declaration of incompatibility of primary legislation with the right to a fair trial after damning assessment of the Department of Work and Pensions’ interference in ongoing cases

Phil Shiner, a solicitor at Public Interest Lawyers, said today:

“This case is another massive blow to this Government’s flawed and tawdry attempts to make poor people on benefits work for companies, who already make massive profits, for free.  Last year the Supreme Court told Iain Duncan Smith and the Coalition government that the scheme was unlawful. In this case the High Court has now told the Government that the attempt to introduce retrospective legislation, after the DWP had lost in the Court of Appeal, is unlawful and a breach of the Human Rights Act and is a further disgraceful example of how far this Government is prepared to go to flout our constitution and the rule of law.  I call on the DWP to ensure that the £130 million of benefits unlawfully withheld from the poorest section of our society is now repaid.” http://www.publicinterestlawyers.co.uk/news_details.php?id=420

European Court of Human Rights challenges UK work schemes

Workfare: Why did so many Labour MPs accept this brutal, unforgivable attack on vulnerable people? http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/workfare-why-did-so-many-labour-mps-accept-this-brutal-unforgivable-attack-on-vulnerable-people-8542193.html

Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/mar/21/labour-abstention-workfare-bill-byrne

Advertisements